Fitbit Alta or Fitbit Ulta HR: Which is Better?

Fitbit is among the most well-recognized brands in the fitness tracking industry. There’s a reason for this, too: Fitbit trackers are often not only easy to use but also stylish and dependable. They present the customer with some incredible statistics, all while being supported by an outstanding app in the background.

The Fitbit Alta and the Fitbit Alta HR are two of their most successful fitness trackers. They both have advantages, with only a few key distinctions between the models. With the arrival of the Fitbit Alta HR to the lineup, deciding on the right Fitbit for your needs has become even more challenging.

What is Fitbit, and what does it do?

Fitbit is a San Francisco-based American startup that was founded in 2007. It has now won multiple industry honors, including the TechCrunch50 runner-up prize for Health and Wellness at CES in 2008 and 2009. It was also ranked 37th among the top 50 most innovative organizations in 2016.

The Fitbit tracker was the original Fitbit product. The Fitbit Alta and Fitbit Alta HR wristband trackers, as well as clip-on trackers like the Fitbit Zip and the recently released Fitbit Charge 3, are now available. Fitbit even has a smartwatch lineup.

A Glance at Design

The Alta and Alta HR look to be strikingly similar at first glance. However, there are several design changes upon closer scrutiny.

The strap on the Alta HR seems to be the most obvious. Instead of a button, there is now a buckle on the strap. It’s a minor adjustment, but it ensures a more snug fit and permits the heart rate sensor to operate correctly and accurately. Its secure fit is also necessary for sleep tracking.

Fitbit has downsized the chip in the HR to make way for a bigger battery and sensor, so the two watches have somewhat different casings.


  1. Heart Rate Monitoring

To begin, the HR initials stand for a heart rate sensor, which is the primary functional distinction between the two types. It measures your heart rate in five-minute time periods throughout the day to keep track of it. While the heart rate sensor is an excellent addition, keep in mind that it is best used for short workouts or tracking your resting heart rate. Your sleep can be tracked in phases with the Alta HR. As a result, you will have a better knowledge of how you sleep and will be able to boost your sleep.

You can record your steps, active time, distance, and calories burned on both versions. The sleep tracker on the Alta is more straightforward, and it doesn’t break down sleep patterns.

  1. Tracking your fitness

SmartTrack is built into both models, allowing them to automatically determine the type of activity you’re doing for logging needs. The Alta HR, on the other hand, provides extra information owing to its heart rate sensor.

Although the heart rate sensor provides more activity data, such as better calories burnt calculations, it is unlikely to be sufficient for elite athletes. The Alta can count your steps and calories burned to a minor degree, but these metrics will not be as precise as the Alta HR’s statistics without a heart rate sensor. Both models seem to be reasonably generous with step tracking and should only be used as a guide.

  1. Sleep Monitoring

The Alta HR determines whether you are sleeping light, deep, or REM using a blend of fluctuating heart rate and accelerometer data. This can help you understand how you sleep and how to have a better night’s sleep.

The more you utilize the tracker to track your rest, the more in tune it will grow with your sleeping patterns, making it more effective over time. The Alta measures how long you’ve been sleeping, how restless you’ve been, and how long you’ve been up, but it doesn’t give you a sense of your sleep stages.

  1. Battery Life 

According to Fitbit, the Alta HR has a seven-day battery life, while some users have complained that it is less. The Alta’s advertised five-day battery life, on the other hand, may be an underestimation due to the absence of a heart rate sensor.

Still, the battery life discrepancy is only a day or so, so it may not be a significant factor.


The Fitbit Alta is the less expensive of the two devices, costing roughly £55 ($68) online.

The Fitbit Alta HR costs some more, starting at roughly £70 ($87).

Each of these monitors has seen price reductions since their initial release, thanks to Fitbit’s introduction of newer models. The Alta cost roughly £99 ($123) for a standard version, and the Alta HR costs around £129 ($160).

Final Call

The Alta has all you need if you’re searching for a simple fitness tracker with all the essential features and a rough estimate of your miles and calorie intake. If you desire more detailed information, the Alta HR’s heart rate sensor will help you optimize your training routine.

In terms of appearance, there isn’t much to choose between the pair. Here’s a quick rundown of the vital distinction between the two models: the decision is now yours!

Fitbit Alta  Fitbit Ulta HR
Design Button Strap Buckle Strap
Characteristics Lack of Heart Rate sensor, bare minimum step tracker, calorie and distance monitor. Present Heart Rate sensor, efficient step, sleep, and distance tracking.
Sleep Monitor Basic  Descriptive
Battery Longevity Approximately five days Approximately seven days
Cost of Purchase 68$ (£55) $87 (£70) 

Leave a Reply