Has Donald Trump Brought American Jobs Back?

Has Donald Trump Brought American Jobs Back?

Donald Trump vowed to be the president who created the most jobs in American history. He promised to create 25 million jobs over the next ten years when running for president in 2016. However, there were 3.1 million fewer jobs in December 2020 than there were in January 2017 when Trump entered office as a result of the COVID-19 epidemic.

Donald Trump would have surpassed the current record-holder, President Bill Clinton, who produced 18.6 million jobs over the course of his two years, if he had been able to maintain his campaign pledge.

Trump stated to the Economic Club of New York that he intended to set a national objective of 4% economic growth in order to create those jobs.

 Let’s examine the specifics of his measures and how they’ve performed so far.

Main Points

President Trump’s agreements and initiatives led to:

  • Prior to the pandemic, 6.6 million jobs were generated.
  • $250 billion in Chinese imports are subject to taxes
  • NAFTA renegotiation with the goal of relocating jobs to the United States
  • the corporation tax rate being lowered from 35% to 21%
  • elimination of a crucial Dodd-Frank requirement for banks with less than $100 billion in assets
  • The Economy and COVID-19

Before the COVID-19 outbreak caused the economy to collapse, Trump produced 6.6 million jobs. In comparison to the 152.2 million people employed at the end of Obama’s presidency, the new employment his programs generated represented an increase of 4.3 percent.

Record job losses were caused by shutdowns to stop the pandemic’s spread.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which Trump signed in March 2020 in reaction to COVID-19, aims to help businesses in a number of ways in order to help them create jobs (of which 20.5 million would be lost in April alone).

  • 50 percent of each employee’s wages up to $10,000 will be used as employee retention credits.
  • Deferrals and credits for payroll taxes
  • Loans for payroll expenses
  • Although the CARES Act offered assistance, there were still 10 million unemployed individuals in February 2021.

U.S.-First Trade Policy

Trump’s “America First” trade policy was founded on economic nationalism. To give native industries a competitive edge, he backed protectionism through tariffs, duties, and other measures. The proposal accomplished this in a number key ways:

Put an end to outsourcing and importing foreign jobs

  • Between 2000 and 2011, America lost 31.4 percent of the manufacturing jobs that were stable and earned, on average, $28.85 per hour.
  • To save money, American businesses outsource many of these positions. It’s possible that eliminating outsourcing won’t bring back every job that was lost because robotics, artificial intelligence, and bioengineering have also rendered certain jobs obsolete. Government-sponsored training for these skills may result in more job growth for Americans than a trade conflict.
  • Boost American competitiveness in comparison to China
  • Trump placed three tariffs in 2018 on Chinese products worth $250 billion. He imposed a 25% tariff on an additional $200 billion worth of products in 2019. China retaliated by imposing duties on $110 billion worth of American goods. 
  • Trump announced a trade agreement between the United States and China in December 2019. China promised to increase its annual imports of specific American commodities by $200 billion as part of the arrangement. 

According to the Federal Reserve, tariffs on Chinese goods cost the typical household $831 annually.

Trump withdrew the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in 2017, claiming that doing so will force American employees to compete with lower-paid foreign labor and result in the export of more jobs.

 The TPP, on the other hand, was established to assist the United States in fortifying its relations with Asian nations that are battling to rival China. Without the TPP, supporters contend, these nations might depend more on China and less on the United States, which would reduce America’s competitiveness. 

Boost American competition with Mexico

There are numerous Trump projects that touch on Mexico.

In 2018, Trump revised the North American Free Trade Agreement with success. Early in 2020, the new agreement—officially known as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)—was ratified by the three countries. Its objective was to recover some of the American manufacturing jobs that had previously been moved across the border. The requirement that more auto parts be produced within the NAFTA trade region is the biggest shift. 

By building the wall along the 1,954-mile border, Trump promised to decrease the amount of laborers entering the US from Mexico. More than 650 miles of the wall have been finished because of legislative measures from George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations. Trump increased the length by 371 more miles, intending to reach 450 miles by the end of 2020. 

Almost half of all current undocumented immigrants entered the country with visas and continued to live there after the documents expired.

lowering corporate and investment taxes.

The corporation tax rate was reduced from 35% to 21% by Trump’s tax plan, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The rate was 223, which was the lowest since 1939.

However, this shift might not be as significant as it seems. Legal deductions are generally well-utilized by corporations.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, lowering business payroll taxes and raising unemployment benefits would be more cost-effective options. Given that small enterprises create 65 percent of all new jobs in the private sector, governments should concentrate any stimulus programs on them.

Spend $1 trillion on infrastructure improvements in the US

President Trump introduced the Rebuild America plan to update America’s dilapidated airports, highways, and bridges in order to generate jobs. In order to leverage a $1 trillion investment in infrastructure. Additionally, it claimed to shorten the permission application procedure from ten to just two years. The proposal ran into numerous obstacles, which contributed to its failure.

One of the best uses of federal funding for job creation is infrastructure construction.

According to a Duke University research group, the Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, every $1 billion the federal government invests in infrastructure generates 21,671 employment.

fewer regulations.

Regulations on banks with less than $100 billion in assets were loosened by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGER CPA).

These banks were exempt from performing stress tests to make sure they could sustain a significant financial disaster due to the weaker constraints. The Fed no longer required banks with assets between $50 and $100 billion to submit a “living will,” which explained how the bank would securely close down in the event of a financial crisis to avoid another bankruptcy on the scale of Lehman Brothers. 

Views from the Outside on Trump’s Plan

By the beginning of 2020, 6.6 million jobs had been added because of Trump’s fiscal stimulus, but the pandemic reversed those gains.

Medical journal New England

According to the New England Journal of Medicine, neither proper testing nor sufficient protective gear were provided for patients, healthcare personnel, or the general public in the U.S.

Additionally, it chastised the administration for delegating disease control to the states rather than implementing a comprehensive plan. Directives for social distance were therefore uneven. Hotspots of infection that developed as a result forced numerous businesses to close and increased unemployment.

National Manufacturers Association

  • Trump’s proposal to reduce U.S. manufacturing prices, which are much higher than those in other nations, was supported by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM).
  •  NAM urged Trump to further relax rules on manufacturing firms since they earn almost twice as much as businesses in other sectors. As a result, American-made items become more expensive. 
  • NAM, however, disapproved of Trump’s protectionism. Even before the pandemic, other nations increased their tariffs in retaliation, which decreased American exports to other nations. It slowed down American economic growth and increased import costs for American consumers.

For a Responsible Federal Budget Committee

Experts disagree on the effectiveness of tax reductions in spurring economic expansion. Tax reductions are frequently viewed as an expensive method of employment creation. The verdict is still out on whether Trump’s 2017 tax cuts would eventually benefit the economy because historically, tax cuts haven’t generated enough new employment to pay for themselves. 

Questions and Answers (FAQs)

The president’s impact on the economy is how much?

The ability of presidential candidates to deliver on their many economic pledges is somewhat constrained. Much depends on variables the president has no control over, such the economy’s state when they take office or national and international events that take place while they are in office. Presidents can influence the economy through making decisions on the budget, tariffs, Federal Reserve appointments, and lobbying Congress, but many of these actions take time to take effect.

How soon does a president start to impact the economy?

During their first year in office, the president’s influence on the economy is less significant. A new president’s first budget doesn’t go into effect until October of that year, even though they present a budget request to Congress in February.

Presidents can create jobs in what ways?

Presidents cannot create jobs on their own, but they may persuade Congress and the Fed to adopt laws and regulations that will encourage job development. Lowering interest rates, funding public works projects, boosting unemployment benefits, and implementing some payroll tax cuts are a few examples of policies that create jobs.

Leave a Reply