Here is a comparison between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 and the Samsung Active 2

The much anticipated new update for Samsung’s Galaxy Watch has finally been made available. It features several enhancements in comparison to the first model, and as a result, the manufacturer skipped a number in order to refer to it as the Galaxy Watch 3.

Now, it takes its place alongside Samsung’s Watch Active 2 as the company’s premier smartwatch offering. This one is a sportier take on the overarching framework, but it also arrives with a tonne of utility packed in, so it’s a great deal all around.

Continue reading if you can’t decide which option is best for you because of the information presented here. We have compared them head-to-head so that you can make an informed choice much more quickly.

Design Comparison between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 with the Active 2 

The designs of Samsung watches are generally consistent with one another. They are all round and have an extremely high-end appearance. To a significant extent, Samsung has remained faithful to a strategy that has shown to be successful, and who can criticize them? It would be a little bit of a letdown if they, too, came up with a watch that looked like the Apple Watch. As it is, we have far too many of these.

When compared side by side, the Galaxy Watch 3 and the Active 2 have a few distinct distinctions between them. They are not particularly significant, but they are understated. Because it is intended for those who lead active lifestyles, the Watch Active 2 is more compact and has a more streamlined form factor. Watch 3 is styled more similarly to a traditional wristwatch.

The Apple Watch 3 has a significantly bigger casing than the Apple Watch 2, despite the fact that both have an AMOLED display of the same size and quality. There, you may choose between a chassis that is 41mm or 45mm in size. According to Samsung, they are approximately 15 per cent thinner than the first version. On the other hand, Active 2 gives the user the option to choose between a 44mm and a 40mm display, and both of them are somewhat less thick than Watch 3.

When it comes to the construction of the new timepiece, you have the option of selecting between stainless steel or titanium. The second option is incredibly lightweight, but it comes with an extremely high cost. The Active 2 comes with a choice of casings made of stainless steel or aluminium; however, due to the lower proportions, these are a little bit lighter than the Watch 3. The detailed specifications are listed in the table that follows.

Here is a comparison between the Galaxy Watch 3 and the Active 2: 

In order to navigate the Tizen OS, Samsung has opted to keep the actual rotating bezel that was previously present. To refresh your memory, the manufacturer chose to replace this feature with a digital spinning bezel for the Watch Active 2 model. In addition, you may navigate using the touchscreen and the two physical buttons that are located on the right.

Under the hood, there are a lot of commonalities to be found. The Exynos 9110 Dual-core 1.15 GHz processor is the same as before, as is the built-in GPS, the activity tracker sensors (Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro, Optical Heart Rate, and Ambient Light), the NFC, and the optional LTE model.

In terms of memory capacity, however, the Watch 3 comes out on top because of the fact that it has 1 gigabyte of Random Access Memory (RAM) and 8 gigabytes of Internal Memory. The Active 2 LTE model is an exception to this rule because it comes standard with 1.5 GB of RAM. It appears that Samsung has concluded that such a large amount is not required and that 1GB is plenty.

Battery life and durability to water are compared between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 and the Active 2. 

Now let’s talk about the battery life, which is obviously quite significant. The development of fully equipped smartwatches is still a challenge, and Samsung is no exception to this trend.

Both of these gadgets are powered by lithium-ion batteries, with the bigger one having a capacity of 340 mAh and the smaller one having a capacity of 247 mAH. This supplies them with enough energy to last for approximately two days (depending on use). Nothing really noteworthy to write home about, but to be anticipated regarding the abundance of technology crammed into such a compact body and the screen that stays on constantly.

Wearable technology is your best bet when it comes to withstanding the effects of water. They have an impressive water resistance rating of 5 ATMs and will keep track of the relevant information during any swimming workouts you participate in. In addition, both of them have a MIL-STD-810G rating, which means that they are able to withstand a significant amount of abuse.

Comparing the Active 2 to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 in Terms of Functionality 

The most recent iteration of Samsung watches all share a number of common functionalities. They will all come equipped with the Tizen operating system, which will enable continuous monitoring of your activities as well as your overall health.

It has all of the basic fitness monitoring sensors as well as an integrated GPS. However, Watch 3 comes equipped with a more in-depth sleep monitoring function, updated running features, and a few other sports modes.

One of the most noticeable differences is that the newest watch comes equipped with a feature that can monitor blood oxygen levels. An upgrade to the programme has recently made this feature available. This function operates primarily during the night and can notify users of potential problems with their sleep.

Because the Active 2 has many of the same sensors integrated into it, one would speculate that this feature will be included in the form of a software update at some point. It’s possible that Samsung will opt against doing so in order to maintain the separation between the two smartphones. The second option is that the business has improved the sensors, which explains why the Watch 3 is able to monitor this information.

Fall notifications are the other supplementary feature that is included with Watch 3. After a short period of time, if the gadget on your wrist judges that you have fallen, it will send a text message or phone emergency personnel on your behalf. This will give them information about your location as well as a short recording of your voice.

Next, there is the electrocardiogram (ECG) functionality. Since its debut on the Apple Watch around one year ago, this feature has proven quite popular among consumers. This feature is also accessible to Active 2 users or will be in the near future. Because Samsung has not yet received regulatory permission, the feature will be activated on a case-by-case basis in each nation.

Measurements of one’s blood pressure follow the exact same pattern. The business is the first of its kind to be able to read a person’s blood pressure using the optical sensors located on the back of the gadget, thus it is breaking new ground in this regard. 

The conclusion between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 and the Active 2 

Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 and the Samsung Galaxy Active 2 share a lot of the same features. It should come as no surprise that the first of them arrive with a few supplemental items. This includes the capacity to monitor blood oxygen levels, the detection of falls, more detail in sleep statistics, many new running capabilities, and a few other sports modes.

A further distinction is in the design. The Active 2 is sleeker, and since it is also smaller, it will appeal to people who are more sporty. Watch 3, on the other hand, has a design that is more traditional than that of a watch.

Choosing either one of these options is a safe bet. Watch 3 has a starting price of $400, which is a significant increase over the $270 cost of Active 2. Even if its price has dropped, Active 2 is still a product that should be considered for purchase.

Leave a Reply