A recent poll found that wearables aid individuals by tracking their exercise and monitoring their heart rate. However, respondents fear that the wearables will fail or provide erroneous health data.
These days, a growing number of us are walking about with some sort of wearable technology fastened to one of our wrists. Their price has dropped, and the market is now crowded with products ranging from extremely inexpensive fitness trackers to very costly watches designed specifically for sports.
The Manifest recently conducted a poll to investigate the most prevalent use-cases for such gadgets as well as the problems that are most frequently mentioned by respondents. The business news and how-to website polled 581 individuals who were conversant with the technology. Of those individuals, around two-thirds were female and one-third were male. Roughly half of them are between the ages of 18 and 34, while another 35 per cent are between the ages of 35 and 54, and 18 per cent were above the age of 55.
It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the majority of us (38 per cent) use wearables primarily to track our fitness. This covers a variety of metrics, such as the number of steps taken, calories burned, the number of floors climbed, heart rate, and amount of sleep. In addition to that, it necessitates the utilisation of some more complex performance measurements for running and several other forms of exercise.
Monitoring vital indicators, in particular the rate of the heart, is the other use case that is mentioned most frequently. About one-quarter of those polled primarily rely on their fitness band or smartwatch for this objective. It gives peace of mind and reduces the frequency with which one must visit the doctor.
For instance, the majority of wearables available on the market today will tell you your heart rate at rest. This is one of the most crucial measures of one’s overall health and level of physical fitness. Some of them also come with alarms that will notify you in real-time if your heart rate when you are at rest has fallen above or below a certain value. This may hint at health concerns that you were not previously aware of but might be a sign of. There are some that will even tell you if you are suffering an erratic heart rate.
In addition, the poll looked at widespread worries. Concerns about erroneous measures top the list with a percentage of 36 per cent, followed by worry about their gadget failing, which was started by 18 per cent of respondents, and issues about becoming overly dependent on the device, which was noted by 14 per cent of respondents.
There is going to be a problem with accuracy at all times. For instance, wearables that detect pulse rate from the wrist are able to provide more accurate readings when the wearer is at rest than when they are engaged in physical activity. When going for a run or riding a bike, it is strongly recommended that you always wear a pulse rate chest strap.
When a person has a specific health condition, such as an erratic heartbeat or high blood pressure, it is very challenging for wearables to deliver reliable measures of that person’s vital signs. In addition, it should in no way be utilised in the process of modifying medical therapies.
One of the people asked said, “I have atrial fibrillation (AFib), which is an irregular heartbeat that can occur sometimes.”
“The heart monitor on the watch is able to detect this, but the feature is rendered useless if the wearer’s heart rate is more than 120 beats per minute. Because this occurs frequently with my AFib, the machine tells me that my heart rate is over 120 beats per minute and that the data are inconclusive rather than diagnosing me with AFib.
A wristwatch or fitness tracker may be an excellent supplement to a routine that focuses on physical fitness or wellness. However, it is important to put things in context and not place one’s complete faith in a technology that could not be entirely accurate. You should absolutely make use of it to monitor your overall health, but you should never let it prevent you from going to the doctor for more specific and in-depth medical concerns.