While the Charge 2 includes a physical button on the right-hand side of the device, the Vivosport does not have any physical buttons. When navigating through the various screens, you will find this to be helpful. Because of this, you will have no choice but to rely entirely on the touchscreen of the Vivosport. During our time with it, we discovered that the display was quite responsive, which means that the absence of any physical buttons is not a concern.
Both of these trackers have rubber bands and come with clasp mechanisms similar to those seen on conventional watches, making them simple to put on and take off. When you make your purchase, the only customization option for Garmin’s wearable that you have is to select a color, as there is not much else you can do to personalize it.
Both Garmin and Fitbit have done a really decent job in terms of the looks of their products. However, because of the always-on color display and ultra-slim form factor of the Vivosport, we would give it a slight edge over its competitor.
Both of these wearables come equipped with an optical heart rate monitor, an altimeter, a vibration motor, and three-axis accelerometers as standard features. In addition to this, the tracker that Garmin sells comes with a GPS sensor already installed in it. While you run, this gives you more accurate information on your pace and distance, and it also frees you from having to carry your phone with you. Because it uses your phone’s GPS readings, the Fitbit Charge 2 also has access to this kind of information, but it requires that your phone be nearby in order to function properly.
Compare the battery life and water resistance of the Fitbit Charge 2 to the Garmin Vivosport
The lifespan of the battery is essential. You most definitely do not want to be in the habit of having to charge your fitness band every single night (Apple, take note…).
Both of these electronic devices are equipped with rechargeable lithium batteries that have a long life. The Charge 2 has a battery life of around 5 days (depending on how it is used, the settings, and various other aspects), which is satisfactory. Even more impressive is the battery life of the Vivosport, which may last up to a week. When the GPS is activated, this time estimate drops to 8 hours.
When it comes to the waterproofing of their products, Garmin has surpassed all other companies. As with the majority of Vivosport’s wearables, the Vivosport is water-resistant down to a depth of fifty meters and may therefore be worn in the shower or while swimming. Swimming exercises will be automatically tracked, but just the most fundamental data will be recorded.
On the other hand, the Charge 2 is impervious to perspiration, rain, and splashes. The Flex 2 and the Ionic are the only wearables offered by Fitbit that are water-resistant.
Which is superior: the Fitbit Charge 2 or the Garmin Vivosport in terms of features?
It should come as no surprise that the most important features can be found on both types of fitness bands. This includes tracking of steps, distance traveled, floors climbed, active minutes, calorie burn, and sleep, as well as continuous monitoring of the user’s heart rate (including information on the user’s current, resting, and target heart rate zones). These are both respected firms with an excellent track record, so you shouldn’t anticipate too much of a difference in terms of the quality of the data.
You can also receive intelligent notifications to keep you connected no matter where you are. If you want to read the texts in their entirety, you will need to use your phone. Since the bands display the time by default, you can also use them as watches if you so choose. Because the screen on the Vivosport is constantly illuminated, using it in this manner is somewhat more convenient.
The trackers will encourage you throughout the day by sending you reminders to move and will give you nudges to get moving if you are having a particularly sedentary day. There is also automatic activity recognition, which means that you will get credit even if you fail to log an exercise. This feature ensures that the app is always keeping track of your progress.
Lastly, in addition to that, you will also receive some more advanced measures such as your VO2 Max. The measure, which is expressed in milliliters of oxygen processed per kilogramme of body weight each minute, reveals how efficiently your body makes use of oxygen when you are exerting the greatest amount of effort. In the past, this feature was only available on the most expensive sports watches. It is a reflection of the individual’s cardio physical fitness.
The fitness band showdown pits the Fitbit Charge 2 against the Garmin Vivosport.
Now we will discuss the distinctions
Stress monitoring is an innovative function that is exclusive to the Vivosport and does not appear on the Charge 2 model. This is accomplished by the tracker by measuring the user’s heart rate variability. You will receive a score between 0 and 100 that will indicate the percentage of the day that you spend feeling stressed.
Sessions of deep breathing can also provide you with relaxing mindfulness experiences, which can help you achieve a state of mental calm. This function is also available on the Charge 2 version of the game.
Garmin’s Strength Training activity is also available on the Vivosport platform for all you gym rats. This is a hybrid method that involves manually marking activities and automatically tallying the number of repetitions. In addition to that, the device graphs the data it collects about your heart rate while you are working out.
Swim tracking is another significant distinction between the two. Because it is water resistant up to 50 meters, the Vivosport can be used in the swimming pool. And let’s not forget the built-in GPS that frees you from having to bring your phone along on your runs.
When it comes to the software, every Garmin tracker uses the same Connect app, which is known for its extensive functionality. On the other hand, there is room for improvement in terms of how easy it is to use. There is no need to worry about missing any information because it is all readily available; all that is required is some searching and some tapping.
Even with the upgrade that it is currently working on, Garmin is still behind Fitbit in terms of functionality. The company, based in San Francisco, has developed a user-friendly and intuitive software platform that is packed with fantastic social capabilities.
In conclusion, we recommend either the Fitbit Charge 2 or the Garmin Vivosport
Both the Charge 2 and the Vivosport are fully functional fitness bands that contain a lot of features and functionality beneath the hood. People who are seeking a hassle-free approach to tracking most areas of their fitness and health around the clock will find that they are among the greatest possibilities available right now with these products.
The Vivosport is obviously the one with the greater number of available features. In terms of its hardware, it has a built-in GPS, resistance to water, an always-on colour screen, an ultraslim profile, and a longer battery life. Additionally, it has a longer profile. In addition, the Garmin tracker monitors your stress levels throughout the day and keeps track of your exercises at the gym, both of which are functions that are absent from the Charge 2 model. Fitbit has an advantage over its competitors due to its excellent and user-friendly software platform as well as its expanded social functions.
The fitness band showdown pits the Fitbit Charge 2 against the Garmin Vivosport
It shouldn’t come as a surprise to you that the tracker made by Garmin is often sold at a higher price than the Fitbit. Therefore, this aspect needs to be taken into account whenever a choice is to be made.
Vivosport is the way to go if you value the additional features that were discussed earlier and are not concerned about the higher price tag. You won’t go wrong with the Charge 2 if you are looking for simplicity and fantastic software, but you don’t require GPS or water resistance in your device.