The showdown of kid-friendly trackers pits the Garmin Vivofit Jr 3 against the Fitbit Ace 3 vs 2

Purchasing a fitness tracker for your children is a great way to start them exercising. There are a variety of reasons why this could be a good idea, with childhood obesity being one of the most important.

Many well-known brands are concentrating their efforts in this area. Garmin and Fitbit are arguably the market leaders, but don’t be surprised if Apple and other companies follow suit.

Make exercise a habit, not a hassle with the best activity trackers for kids.

Fitbit and Garmin both have three fitness trackers developed exclusively for children. In this post, we compare the most recent models: the Garmin Vivofit Jr 3 vs. the Fitbit Ace 3 vs. Ace 2.

Garmin Vivofit Jr 3 vs. Jr 2: a comparison of kids’ fitness trackers

Fitbit Ace 3 versus Garmin Vivofit Jr 3

In terms of appearance, the Garmin Vivofit Jr. 3 stands apart from the previous two models. It looks more like a smartwatch than a fitness tracker because of its square shape.

The device has a 14.11 by 14.11 mm transflective 64-color memory-in-pixel (MIP) display. It has a resolution of 112 by 112 pixels.

The device is still made of silicone and plastic, which makes it extremely durable. These materials also help it to be exceptionally light — the Vivofit Jr. 3 just weighs 25 gramsC.

A coin-cell battery powers everything. All you’ll have to do is remember to replace it once a year.

As you may expect based on the appearance, this generation is aimed at children aged 4 and up. Previous generations of Garmin were designed for slightly older youngsters.

Garmin quietly unveiled the Vivofit Jr. 3 fitness tracker for youngsters.

The Garmin Fitbit Ace 3 and Ace 2 are nearly identical in appearance.Both feature a tough build and a huge display. The third generation is merely a step forward. The biggest physical difference is that the Ace 3’s edges are curved, and the single physical button on the left is slightly more protected by the silicone band. The display has also been improved slightly.

When you compare the Ace 3 or Ace 2 to the Garmin Vivofit Jr. 3, you’ll see a comparable lightweight design. Not only are the materials identical, but both feature bumpers around the display to protect it and are water-resistant to 5 ATM.

Fitbit devices retain the fitness tracker design, which is a significant change. In comparison to the color screen on Garmin’s device, this one is extended and grayscale.

Another significant distinction is the battery life. The Fitbit Ace 3 requires charging every 8 days, while the Ace 2 requires charging every 5 days. The Garmin will last for a year, but if you want it to last longer, you’ll need to get a coin-cell battery replacement.

Intelligent features and activity tracking

Everything else is secondary to the primary purpose of these devices, which is fitness tracking. The trio does not include a heart rate monitor, but it does feature an accelerometer that allows basic metrics to be tracked. It all centers around the WHO-recommended hour of moderate to high-intensity physical activity every day.

In addition to tracking steps, sleep, and calories, Fitbit devices offer an active minute target that aligns with this statistic. Animated clock faces, as well as celebratory notes and badges, will keep your kids entertained. If you choose Ace 3, you’ll have a larger option of clock faces.

What’s the difference between a Garmin Vivofit and a Vivosmart 3?

Parents can personalize reminders and alarms using the associated smartphone app. There is a distinct view for parents and one for children. The first can be used to customize privacy settings and maintain tabs on your child’s activities. Kids can utilize the second view to check their own stats and compete with others, including relatives, in step competitions.

Gamification is a strong suit for Garmin. Their gadgets strive to keep kids interested by offering instructive mobile excursions. More entertaining information and mobile adventure trails are revealed as your child becomes more active.

Another great feature of Vivofit Jr 3 is that it allows parents to give duties and rewards through the accompanying app. These will be synchronized to your child’s watch, allowing them to know exactly what they need to do. Garmin, unlike Fitbit, only has a parent app, which is a significant distinction to note.

An ICE (In Case of Emergency) widget on the watch is a new feature introduced with the Vivofit Jr. 3. This can be used by parents to enter their child’s emergency contact information for easy access in the event of an emergency.

Notifications are the final distinction worth highlighting. Your children will be able to receive them on Fitbit fitness bands, but this is not possible with Garmin. They’ll need to have their phone with them to see text, email, and call notifications, and their parents can approve contacts ahead of time.

Bottom line: Garmin Vivofit Jr. 3 vs. Fitbit Ace 3 vs. 2:

When it comes to kids’ fitness tracking, Garmin and Fitbit are at the top of the list. Both companies have a solid product line with products that transcend generations.

The Garmin Vivofit Jr 3, Fitbit Ace 3, and Fitbit Ace 2 all feature a comparable, durable design with adequate water resistance. When it comes to appearances, the Garmin device is supposed to look like a smartwatch, whilst the Fitbits appear to be fitness bands. As a result, the Vivofit Jr has a larger color display rather than a grayscale display like the Fitbits.

Another significant distinction is how the devices are maintained. The Ace 3 must be charged every eight days, the Ace 2 every five days, and the Garmin is powered by a coin-cell battery that must be replaced once a year.

What’s the difference between a Garmin Vivofit and a Vivosmart 3?

When it comes to fitness tracking, all of these devices provide identical information. These are centered on the WHO-recommended 60 minutes of daily exercise.

With its adventure games and hands-on approach for parents, Vivofit Jr 3 is more suitable for younger children. The Fitbits will give your kids greater independence because they work more like regular fitness trackers, including calorie tracking and smartphone notifications. The Ace 3 is a somewhat better alternative than the Ace 2 since it has a longer battery life, a slightly better display, and more clock faces, but it costs $10 more.

Whichever device you select, it will not cost you a fortune. Because the price difference is so small, the decision will be based on your own preference for design and brand, as well as some minor details.

Garmin’s Vivofit Jr. 3 is available for purchase at Fitbit’s products are available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply