WatchMaker VS Facer: Which One is Better?

The ability to switch between several watch faces is one of the nicest features offered by modern smartwatches. This ensures that users are not subjected to the monotony of seeing the same watch face on a daily basis.

When it comes to watch faces, the two most popular applications are WatchMaker and Facer. Within these apps, you may choose from thousands of different watch faces.

This article is for you if you are interested in utilizing one of these applications but are unsure which one is the superior option.

In addition, make it a point to look at the piece I wrote on the best Garmin watch settings for crossfit and the gym.

In this all-encompassing tutorial, I will contrast and compare the many components of WatchMaker and Facer so that you may make an informed choice. Let’s get started.

The WatchMaker and the Facer: A Collection of Watch Faces

Let’s begin our comparison by looking at each app’s Watch Faces collection, which is one of the first things you should take note of when looking at any watch face app.

WatchMaker is well-known for the many different watch faces that it offers, and the software itself has a library of more than 100,000 different watch faces. Facer, on the other hand, has a library of over 70,000 different watch faces right out of the box.

Both applications were tested on my own personal smartphone, and I can say with certainty that the watch faces available in both apps are of very high quality. Therefore, WatchMaker is the obvious winner in this category due to its extensive library of watch faces.

The watchmaker is often referred to as the facer.

Both apps include hundreds of different watch faces; however, if you want to create your own, you can do so using the Watch Face Maker, which is included in both apps.

The Watch Face Maker, included with WatchMaker, is a serviceable piece of software. It provides a large number of choices that you can use to include numerous components, such as the date, the phase of the moon, animation, a ring, a map, and other days. Additionally, it is also packed with a plethora of other capabilities as well.

You can use the creator to build a watch face that is passable, but if you want access to additional options, you will need to upgrade to a premium membership.

Facer, on the other hand, does not include its own Watch Face Maker inside the application itself. If you wish to design a new watch face, you will need to make use of the web-based Watch Face Maker, which you can access from your personal computer or laptop. Although the Facer watch face maker has a decent general layout, there is certainly potential for advancement in this area.

If I were to compare the WatchMaker Watch Face Maker to the other Watch Face Maker in terms of its user interface, I would choose the WatchMaker Watch Face Maker since it is simpler and more straightforward to use. In addition to this, WatchMaker has an integrated Watch Face Maker, which is a significant benefit.

WatchMaker and Facer: A Comparison of the Platforms They Support

Both WatchMaker and Facer are very well-liked applications, and you can get both of them on all of the main platforms. WatchMaker may be downloaded via the Google Play Store, the Apple App Store, and the Samsung Galaxy Store.

In a similar vein, Facer may be downloaded via the Play Store, the App Store, or the Galaxy Store.

Each of these applications are excellent, and there is no clear winner in this category since both of them support the same platforms.

My Experience Working as a WatchMaker vs. a Facer

Let’s speak about my experience using both applications now that we’ve covered practically everything else in this conversation. I have had these mobile applications in my life for a considerable amount of time, and as a result, I have some reflections that I would want to share with you.

First things first, let’s talk about the WatchMaker. The fact that WatchMaker has a user interface that is not complicated and easy to understand is the aspect of the program that appealed to me the most.

A significant advantage is that it already has a dark mode enabled by default. Additionally, everything is much simpler to locate, which makes it much less difficult to utilize the program. The ads that would come up after every third or fourth touch were the one thing about WatchMaker that I found quite grating. This kind of advertising might be considered rather pushy.

The app also encourages users to purchase its $7.99 monthly membership even though the watch already comes with a lot of fantastic capabilities. Many of those functions and watch faces cost extra money.

When it comes to Facer, it also has a very user-friendly UI of its own. You won’t have any trouble finding what you’re searching for thanks to the user interface’s excellent intuitiveness. A further positive indicator is that, in comparison to the WatchMaker, its promotion is not nearly as forceful as the latter.

The app has a reasonable number of free watch faces, but the vast bulk of the high-quality watch faces are available as expensive add-ons. They are not prohibitively costly by any means, but, due to the fact that they are premium watch faces, you will be required to pay for them.

The Facer app is the one I’d recommend using out of the two since it doesn’t push advertisements in your face as much as the other one does and it has a good selection of watch faces by default. You have the option of using WatchMaker, but it will completely spoil your experience and even your mood with its persistent and intrusive advertisements.

Comparing WatchMaker with Facer: What Do Customers Have to Say?

Now, let’s take a look at the overall ratings of these applications as well as the feedback that people have provided about them. WatchMaker has received over 51,000 ratings and reviews in the Google Play Store, with an average rating of 3.5 stars. Facer, on the other hand, has over 55,000 reviews and a rating of 4.2 stars as the average across all of them. It is abundantly evident, on the basis of the rating, that Facer is more well-liked than WatchMaker.

However, when it comes to the App Store, everything takes a sharp turn for the worse. WatchMaker has received over 9,000 ratings and reviews on the App Store, with an average rating of 3.5 stars. Facer, on the other hand, has had just five customer reviews, and they have given it an average rating of 2.6 stars. According to these evaluations, WatchMaker is becoming more well-liked on the App Store.

I also looked through the evaluations, and one of the most significant issues with mobile applications was their lack of consistency. On WatchMaker, a great number of users stated that they were unable to download their watch faces, and the developers were clueless as to why this was happening.

In a similar vein, other users complained about the various flaws and other problems in the Facer app. Both programs, when seen as a whole, are plagued with issues, and the creators really need to put more effort into improving them in light of the prices they demand.


That’s all I have to say, guys. In general, WatchMaker and Facer are two excellent applications, and each software has both positives and negatives that users should be aware of. However, if I were forced to choose only one, I would go with Facer since, in comparison to WatchMaker, it is superior and displays fewer advertisements.

In the event that you have any inquiries, please make them known to me in the comments area below. Additionally, check out WearToTrack for other helpful information.

Leave a Reply