Which one is a better investment, the Garmin Vivoactive 4 or the Fitbit Charge 3?

In the realm of activity trackers, two of the most well-known brands are Garmin and Fitbit. Garmin was first. Fitbit was second. These are the brands that have become synonymous in our minds with precision and dependability. Although none of their wearables is without flaws if you are looking for anything that can monitor your activities around the clock, any of these would be a fantastic choice for you to consider.

The fact that Google has purchased Fitbit as of late has, of course, being the most notable piece of news in recent times. It is not yet clear what repercussions this will have on the San Francisco band. Since the actual transaction will not take place until sometime in 2020, there is still some time before we learn the answer to this question. It is hoped that the takeover will result in Fitbit’s wearable range seeing further success and expansion.

It will also be fascinating to observe if this has any effect on the product portfolio that the company intends to release in the near future. Spring of 2020 is probably the earliest that we can anticipate hearing something from the outfit. You’ll just have to make do with the devices they already have available for the time being. One of these is the Charge 3, which has been our most popular model.

Garmin has also had a busy few months to look back on. The business has revitalised a significant portion of its wearable product range in addition to producing a sizeable quantity of sports watches. Its primary rival in the market for all-purpose fitness watches is now the Vivoactive 4, which was released in 2018.

Both the Charge 3 and the Vivoactive 4 are excellent choices for you if you are looking for a device that can monitor your fitness at all times of the day and night. This is a detailed comparison of how they fare.

What are the distinctions between the Garmin Vivoactive 4, the Venu, and the Vivoactive 3? 

The Vivoactive 4 and the Fitbit Charge 3 couldn’t be much more dissimilar to one another in terms of their physical appearance. It is very evident that the first item is presented in the shape of a watch, whereas the second item is presented as a fitness band.

The Vivoactive 4/4s features a design that is circular and rather conventional. In contrast to the Charge 3, which is only available in a single size option, it comes with the option of either a 45mm case (Vivoactive 4) or a 40mm case (4s).

Those who have a little bit more cash available also have the option of purchasing the Garmin Venu, which is the third generation of this product. This watch is virtually identical to the one described above, with the exception that it utilises an AMOLED display rather than a transflective one. This variant has a case that measures 43 millimetres in diameter.

The display on the Fitbit Charge 3 is also significantly reduced in size due to the device’s more compact overall size. In spite of the fact that it is merely 38 x 18.3mm in size, it is adequate for the task. In addition, there is only a grayscale displayed on the screen. When navigating the menus, in addition to using the touch screen, you can also use the one mechanical button that is provided. There are two on the Vivoactive 4. (in addition to the touch-screen).

The Garmin and the Fitbit are visually very different from one another in a number of important respects. Aesthetically speaking, there is no apparent frontrunner, and most of the time it comes down to personal preference. Your option is abundantly evident if what you seek is a more luxurious product with a more visible display and a design that is reminiscent of a wristwatch. Charge 3, on the other hand, is the way to go if you’re looking for something less obvious to draw attention to yourself.

When it comes to battery capacity, each of these two gadgets will provide you with approximately a week’s worth, which is not a bad amount at all. When the GPS is turned on, the Vivoactive’s battery life drops to somewhere between 5 and 6 hours. Only Connected GPS is available on the Charge 3, as it does not have an internal GPS receiver.

Comparing the activity tracking features of the Garmin Vivoactive 4 to the Fitbit Charge 3 

If you are searching for a fitness watch, the Charge 3 range, as well as the Vivoactive 4 range, are both excellent options. They will monitor a broad selection of sports around the clock and provide coverage for all of your needs. Since these are not the first generation of gadgets, the fundamentals have been ironed out for some time.

Which is better for you, the Fitbit Charge 3 or the Fitbit Versa? 

Do not expect to see any distinctions in the capabilities offered by the various Vivoactive 4 configurations. These are all equivalent to one another. On the other hand, when contrasted with the Fitbit Charge 3, there are a number of key distinctions. In addition, the majority of them are in support of the Garmins.

The Vivoactive 4 comes equipped with a compass as well as a thermometer in addition to the standard features of an accelerometer, an altimeter, and a heart rate sensor. Also, let’s not forget that it already has a GPS built-in. 

Those individuals who often engage in activities outside, such as running or cycling, but do not wish to bring their phones along would benefit from the most recent change. Connected GPS indicates that the fitness tracker connects to the satellite signal transmitted by your smartphone.

Aside from that, the Vivoactives give data for pulse oxygen and an estimate of the user’s respiratory rate. The first step is performed manually and is done largely at night, although readings can be taken at any time during the day if necessary. The second component is performed continuously. The new Body Battery function is one example of the additional capabilities. Based on the amount of rest you’ve had and the amount of activity you’ve done, this will inform you when to go all out and when to take it easy. Garmin watches can monitor your heart rate even when you are submerged in water, making them the superior choice for swimmers.

At the moment, Fitbit does not offer any of these features. That is to say, Fitbit has not enabled the capability of the Pulse Ox sensor that is included with the Charge 3; nonetheless, the device does come with the sensor. We’ve been told that it will be available very soon, but you shouldn’t get too excited about it just yet.

The company’s software eco-system is the lone factor that tips the scales in Fitbit’s favour. Although Garmin is making modest but steady progress in catching up, Fitbit’s mobile app and website dashboard are superior in terms of usability.

Both of these devices display smartphone alerts, making them both functionally similar in terms of their smart capabilities. However, the Vivoactives take things a step further by including onboard storage for music as well as NFC for making payments while on the move. NFC functionality is exclusive to the Charge 3 Special Edition.

How to decide between the Garmin Vivoactive 4 or the Fitbit Charge 3?

When it comes to monitoring your activity around the clock, whether you go for a device from the Garmin Vivoactive 4 line or the Fitbit Charge 3, you won’t have to worry about anything. Both of these options have you covered. Each of these does a good job with the fundamentals.

The Garmin gadgets cost more, therefore they must naturally cover more ground. The other features of the fitness tracker include pulse oxygen, breathing, heart rate when swimming, stress monitoring, and an integrated GPS.

The aesthetic component comes into play after that. The Garmin comes in the shape of a watch that is more conventional in appearance, while the Fitbit comes in the form of a fitness band. The two gadgets couldn’t be more dissimilar from one another.

Therefore, the option is unmistakable. The Charge 3 is a good option for anyone who wants a wearable device that doesn’t draw attention to itself and can silently track their activity around the clock. It is an excellent all-around fitness band and comes highly recommended by us. One of the products in the Vivoactive 4 line is the better option for those who want a little bit more and like a design that resembles a watch.

The decision is not particularly difficult, but the cost might make a difference. On the website of Garmin, the Vivoactive 4/4S retail for $350, while the Venu retails for $400. You can check the price on Amazon. Charge 3 is now being sold by Fitbit at a price range of approximately $150. (check price on Amazon). Therefore, purchasing a Garmin will get you access to a greater number of features; however, the cost of these devices is substantially higher than that of the Charge 3.

Leave a Reply