Which should you get, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Garmin is a company that manufactures devices for people who are really interested in keeping track of their various sporting adventures. Its strategy focuses on creating purpose-built gadgets for customers interested in activities such as running, cycling, swimming, golfing, and other sports and activities. And even while there might be some overlap with clients of Fitbit, that overlap is extremely limited. That is, up until this point.

In the past, Fitbit’s primary focus has been on developing fitness trackers that are more socially oriented and come equipped with a killer app. On the other hand, its software platform relies less heavily on data than Garmin’s does. With the release of the Ionic, Fitbit has officially entered the realm of sports watches and is now in direct competition with the recently released Vivoactive 3 timepiece from Garmin.

These two pieces of hardware demonstrate that the respective manufacturers have achieved significant progress in terms of design, functionality, and feature set. How do they stack up against one another?

Design Considerations for the Fitbit Ionic vs. the Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Ionic and the Vivoactive 3 couldn’t be much more dissimilar to one another in terms of their physical appearance.

The Ionic Blaze fitness tracker has the same square design as its predecessor, the Blaze. Aluminum of the 6000 series, which is of an aerospace-grade, is used in the construction of its core unit, which makes it both sturdy and lightweight. This is a relatively lightweight device given its width of 38 millimeters, its depth of 12 millimeters, and its weight of 50 grams. You navigate using the touchscreen as well as the three buttons located on the sides (one on the left and two on the right). It only takes a little bit of practice until you’ll be able to breeze through the statistics.

Fitbit has designed its most advanced screen to date in order to compete with the Apple Watch. It has a pixel count that’s been bumped up, and its brightness can reach up to a thousand nits. In terms of its technical specifications, the Ionic has a high-resolution LCD touchscreen that is 348 by 250 pixels and has a screen real estate that measures 29 by 21mm.The first Fitbit smartwatch comes with interchangeable bands, allowing you to personalize the device any way you see fit. There is a wide selection of hues and materials available to pick from, including elastomer, leather, and stainless steel, among others. They can be fastened using spring bars with a rapid release, while the tracker module can be removed by simply popping it out.

Which should you get, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Image source: The Fitbit Vivoactive 3 is the most recent iteration of the Vivoactive HR tracker. Its predecessor is likely one of the fitness trackers that offers the finest value for the money among all of those that are now available. But there is a significant issue: it is also one of the most unsightly fitness trackers on the market today. Garmin has come to the conclusion, which is quite appropriate, that it needs a more appealing form factor in order for the Vivoactive to appeal to a wider client base. In this regard, the product of the third generation does not fall short of expectations.

The new design, which is a sophisticated spherical shape, is more in keeping with Garmin’s Fenix and Forerunner product lines. Finally, there is a sports watch that is sized well for both men and women, measuring 43.4 centimeters by 43.4 centimeters by 11.7 centimeters and weighing only 43 grams. The one physical button located on the right is used in conjunction with swiping your finger across the touchscreen in order to navigate.

The very vivid and simple to read memory-in-pixel (MIP) screen has a diameter of 30.4 millimeters and is sunlight readable, transflective, and uses memory-in-pixel technology. It has a resolution of 240 by 240 pixels built right in.

Garmin’s tracker, the Ionic, has a display that is constantly on, in contrast to Fitbit’s Vivoactive 3, which has a screen that is turned off by default in order to save battery life. This is one of the most significant differences between the two trackers. The display on the Fitbit is higher resolution, however.

Which should you get, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Image source: Garmin

There is not much of a difference between the two under the hood. Both have a vibration motor, an optical heart rate monitor, a barometric altimeter, a compass, GPS, and a vibration motor. They also share an ambient light sensor.

The conic, however, also includes something that Fitbit refers to as a relative SpO2 sensor. This determines the amount of oxygen in the blood and has the potential to be used in the future to diagnose sleep apnea. In addition, the Vivoactive 3 comes with a thermometer that can be used to determine the temperature of the surrounding air.

Comparison of the battery life and water resistance of the Fitbit Ionic vs the Garmin Vivoactive 3

Both the Ionic and the Vivoactive 3 come with a battery life that is rather satisfactory. However, the Garmin device will continue functioning for a longer period of time.

With the Vivoactive 3, you won’t need to worry about charging it for an entire week. This is perfect for staying in distant regions for extended periods of time at a time. When the GPS is on, this time frame is reduced to just 13 hours.

On the other hand, the Ionic can operate for approximately four days, although this time is reduced to ten hours while using GPS tracking. Which is still pretty impressive, especially when contrasted with the pitiful 18 hours that the Apple Watch offers in its battery life.

Water resistance is a crucial component for any fitness tracker that aspires to become a real 24/7 fitness tracker. Both trackers readily satisfy this need, as each has a water resistance rating of 5 ATM, which is equivalent to a depth of 50 meters.

Fitbit Ionic vs. Garmin Vivoactive 3: A Comparison of Their Features

Either one of these two gadgets is more than capable of providing you with the essential fitness monitoring features you need. This takes into account the typical number of steps, calories, miles, and floors. You will receive in-depth information regarding your night’s rest via the companion smartphone app when you wake up.

The trackers will encourage you throughout the day by sending you reminders to move and will give you nudges to get moving if you are having a particularly sedentary day. There is also automatic activity recognition, which means that you will get credit even if you fail to log an exercise. This feature ensures that the app is always keeping track of your progress.

During your workout, the optical heart rate sensor will provide you information on the various heart rate zones, and it will also tell you what your resting heart rate is in the morning. In addition to this, you will have an evaluation of your cardiovascular fitness level (VO2Max), and there will be breathing exercises to assist you remain calm.

Because they come equipped with their own GPS systems, sports watches also allow users to work out without needing to use their phones. While you are running, information on your pace, distance, elevation, and split timings will be shown to you. Both the Ionic and the Vivoactive 3 will keep track of your swimming activities, including information such as the lap count, total time spent swimming, calories burned, and more.

Which device is better, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Now we will discuss the distinctions

The Ionic has unveiled a brand new sensor that provides readings for SP02. This determines the level of oxygenation in your blood, or how efficiently oxygen is delivered to areas of your body that are located at a distance from your heart (such as arms and legs). This sensor has the potential to one day be utilized in the diagnosis of sleep apnea. James Park, the CEO of Fitbit, stated that he is also hopeful that the Ionic will be able to identify atrial fibrillation.

On the other side, the Vivoactive 3 includes an increased number of fitness features for tracking sports. In addition to that, it monitors your stress levels throughout the day, something that the Fitbit device does not offer. This is accomplished by the tracker by measuring the user’s heart-rate variability. You will receive a score between 0 and 100 that will indicate the percentage of the day that you spend feeling stressed. For those who spend a lot of time lifting weights, Garmin has an activity called Strength Training. This is a hybrid method that involves manually marking activities and automatically tallying the number of repetitions.

Which should you get, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Both of these timepieces come with functions that are not related to fitness, despite the fact that neither of the two can really compete with the Apple Watch on this metric. This consists of alerts (calls, texts, calendar events push notifications from your favorite apps), an app store, and control over your music. The Iconic, on the other hand, features a built-in music storage capacity of 2.5 GB. This is sufficient for somewhere in the neighborhood of 300 songs and represents a significant point in Fitbit’s favor.

Another first for Fitbit and Garmin is the incorporation of an NFC chip into their respective wearables. This chip can save your credit card information, allowing you to leave your wallet at home. Because of this, you will now be able to pay for your coffee directly from your wrist. American Express cards, as well as certain Visa and Mastercards issued by supported financial institutions, will be accepted via Fitbit Pay. FitPay is what enables the new feature on the Vivoactive 3, and it also supports debit and credit cards from Visa and Mastercard that are issued by major financial institutions.

Which should you get, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Every Fitbit tracker utilizes the same smartphone app and internet dashboard, both of which are extremely user-friendly and perhaps the best options available. The Connect platform from Garmin was first developed with more serious athletes and fitness enthusiasts in mind. In spite of the fact that it is extremely exhaustive, the clarity and coherence of the presentation could be improved. However, the firm is now working on an update that will hopefully fix some of these problems, so stay tuned for that.

 Fitbit Ionic or Garmin Vivoactive 3: The bottom line Both the Ionic and the Vivoactive 3 are fully equipped sports watches that cram a lot of functionality into their designs. You can’t make a mistake by selecting either one of them. Both are capable of monitoring your fitness round-the-clock, are water resistant, and include GPS so you can keep track of your distance and pace while running. The trackers have about the same sensors and can be purchased for prices that are comparable to one another.

When it comes to their physical appearance, though, the two devices are polar opposites from one another. We believe that the Garmin timepiece easily takes first place in this category due to its always-on display, spherical design, and longer battery life. On the other hand, if you place a high priority on the display quality of your device, you will be delighted with the Ionic.

Which should you get, the Fitbit Ionic or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

In terms of the characteristics it offers, Garmin is most suited for those who are interested in detailed performance and endurance sports. When it comes to tracking sports, the Vivoactive 3 shines thanks to its support for golf, skiing, cycling with a cadence/speed sensor, and the ability to navigate back to a waypoint that you’ve previously recorded. In addition to this, you will have to monitor stress all day long and keep close tabs on the number of reps and sets you complete in the gym.

Additionally, the Ionic has a lot working in its favor. The original Fitbit wristwatch is ideal for individuals who prefer more straightforward user interfaces, are more concerned with monitoring their day-to-day activities, and take pleasure in various social functions. Ionic also includes the capacity to save music locally on the device, making it possible to enjoy a phone-free environment while using the product.

Garmin and Fitbit each have their own dedicated followings of customers. It is our educated assumption that those who are already a part of the ecosystems maintained by Garmin or Fitbit will opt to remain where they are. Because there is so little that differentiates the two, the decision ultimately boils down to one’s individual preferences.

Leave a Reply