Why Is There Such a Significant Pricing Gap Between the Garmin Venu SQ and the Garmin Venu?

The premium-looking activity tracker device known as Garmin Venu was introduced to the market in September of 2019. After a year has passed, we can see that the corporation has already followed up on this. The replacement, on the other hand, is nothing like a classic in terms of both its appearance and the demographic it is aimed at.

In addition to this, the price of the Venu SQ is significantly lower than the price of the device from the first generation. Venu SQ can be purchased for only $200, whereas the standard version of Venu costs $350. The music edition of Venu SQ costs an additional $250.

Why is there such a significant difference in prices? Continue reading to find out.

Design and Hardware Analysis of the Garmin Venu SQ and Venu

When you compare the Venu SQ with the Venu, you might be shocked to learn that they are both part of the same product family manufactured by Garmin. This is due to the fact that they do not resemble each other in any way.

The original model had a rounder, more conventional design, which is a style that Garmin has utilized for the majority of its athletic monitor offerings. On the other hand, the Venu SQ is analogous to the Versa 3 model. It has a shape that is roughly square and is not as appealing as other shapes, but it is more useful.

Instead of a complete OLED display, the Venu SQ from Garmin has a touch-screen LCD panel that is 1.3 inches in size. This decision was made in order to keep the price as low as possible. Because of this, the resolution is only 240 by 240 pixels, which is not very spectacular. You do, however, have the choice to use an always-on mode.

The original model, on the other hand, features a stunning AMOLED display that is 1.2 inches in size and is comparable to what you would find on an Apple watch. And this is the primary cause of the significantly increased cost.

The pixel resolution of this device is 390 x 390, making it superior to that of the Venu SQ in this regard. This is the case in spite of the reduced size of the display. Your fitness numbers and messages, needless to say, are now a lot simpler to read as a result of this change.

There are other distinctions in the designs after that point. The device of the first generation is likewise constructed from a material that is slightly more premium. This model features a bezel made of stainless steel rather than aluminum as standard equipment.

There is not much of a difference between each of them in terms of their actual dimensions. The Venu SQ is the one that is slightly more narrow, thinner, and lighter than the other, so it may be better suited for those who have wrists that are more narrow.

The touch displays on both timepieces can be used to navigate the respective timepieces. In addition to this, there are two physical buttons located on the side.

You’ll find virtually exactly the same technology under the hood. A barometric altimeter, which can be used for floor counting, and a gyroscope, which can provide more accurate tracking, are the only additional features on Venu. Both watches come equipped with an accelerometer, an optical sensor for measuring heart rate, and a SpO2 sensor. Additionally, it has a built-in GPS as well as NFC for making contactless payments.

If you want to listen to music while you’re using the Venu SQ, you’ll need to fork over an additional fifty dollars to purchase the music option. This is how things are set up by default on the initial device.

Both of these have a battery life that lasts approximately 5 and 6 days on a full charge, so that’s something to keep in mind. Venu SQ could keep running for a little while longer, but there isn’t much of a difference between the two options. If you turn on your GPS, you’ll only get about six hours out of the battery. However, there is a catch. This battery life estimate for Venu accounts for the absence of an option to keep the screen illuminated at all times. If you make some adjustments, you can cut the time down to somewhere between 2 and 3 days.

The following table provides an overview of all of the key distinctions between the devices of the first generation and those of the second generation.


Garmin Venu SQ Music

Garmin Venu 

Case material

fiber-reinforced polymer

fiber-reinforced polymer with polymer rear cover

Bezel material

anodized aluminum

stainless steel

Quick release bands

20mm silicone

20mm silicone

Physical size

40.6 x 37.0 x 11.5 mm

43.2 x 43.2 x 12.4 mm mm

Display size

1.3 inches (33.1 mm) diagonal

1.2? (30.4mm) diameter



240 x

240 pixels

390 x

390 pixels

Display type

Liquid crystal touchscreen

Colour AMOLED touchscreen


37.6 g

46.3 g

Water resistance




Compass, accelerometer, thermometer, heart rate, SpO2, Ambient light sensor

Barometric altimeter, gyroscope, compass, accelerometer, thermometer, heart rate, SpO2, Ambient light sensor

Built-in GPS




Microphones, speaker, vibration motor

Microphones, speaker, vibration motor



up to

500 songs (4GB)

up to

500 songs (4GB)




Battery life (base model)

Smartwatch mode: Up to 6 days

GPS mode with music: Up to 6 hours

GPS mode without music: Up to 14 hours

Smartwatch mode: Up to 5 days

GPS mode with music: Up to 6 hours

GPS mode without music: Up to 20 hours


$199 (Music $249)


Comparison of the Activity Tracking and Intelligent Features of the Garmin Venu SQ and the Garmin Venu

This segment won’t take up much of your time. Why? This is mostly due to the fact that both watches monitor more or less the same stuff.

The barometric altimeter is the single most valuable innovation that comes standard with the Venu. This means that, unlike its predecessor, the device can keep track of how many floors it has been to.

The on-screen workout graphics are another important distinction between the two options. Venu is a great choice for this kind of project because of how well it looks.

These are free animations that have already been developed for yoga, Pilates, cardio, and strength training. They come with detailed instructions that can be downloaded onto your watch to assist you in visualizing the various steps of the exercises. It is quite easy to figure out what comes next if you just follow the movement instructions that are presented on the screen.

Concluding Thoughts Garmin Venu SQ and Venu

The premium design of the Garmin Venu is the primary factor that contributes to its significantly higher price in comparison to the Venu SQ. To be more specific, the display on the clock is an elegant OLED with a high resolution, but its successor simply has an LCD display.

Both the functionality and the duration of the battery life are virtually identical. The barometric altimeter for floor count and on-screen training animations are the primary bonuses that come with the first generation of this product. And let’s be honest: for the majority of people, this won’t make a significant difference at all.

The big question is whether you are willing to shell out additional cash for the premium appearance and flashy display. If not, and assuming you don’t mind the square design, Venu SQ is a wonderful cost-saving option that presents itself to you.

Both watches may be purchased from Amazon and Garmin, respectively.

Leave a Reply