Which one is better, the Apple Watch 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

As we move closer and closer to the end of the year, it is becoming increasingly obvious which devices will be competing for a spot on your wrist during the upcoming Christmas season. In addition to this, there is going to be a substantial amount of competitiveness.

A new smartwatch from Apple, which is the company’s third generation, was released not too long ago. The most exciting aspect of this development is the realization that you can make phone calls using only your wrist rather than your smartphone. The capabilities of the device in tracking one’s fitness have also been improved in recent iterations.On the other hand, Garmin has introduced a wide variety of brand new products. One of these is the Garmin Vivoactive 3, a multi-tool for monitoring physical activity. It is expected to compete with the Apple Watch for the same group of people because it is significantly more fashionable and a little bit more intelligent than its predecessor.

However, it is important to highlight the various intricacies and nuances that each one possesses. Let’s compare the effectiveness of these two tools side by side.

Design Comparison: Apple Watch 3 vs. Garmin Vivoactive 3

The Vivoactive 3 was released just this past month and is an improved version of the Vivoactive HR. In terms of value for money, it is definitely one of the fitness trackers that comes with the most features overall. Garmin has taken all of these functions, added a few more, improved the sensors and processor, and packaged them all into an appealing spherical shape. The device can now be found in stores.

The design of the Garmin Vivoactive 3 now more closely resembles that of the Fenix and Forerunner product lines. This is a sports watch that can be worn by either a man or a woman, as it has the dimensions of 43.4 centimeters by 43.4 centimeters by 11.7 centimeters and weighs only 43 grams. The one physical button located on the right can be used for navigation, and the touch display can be navigated by swiping your finger across it. In addition, there is a swipe strip located on one of the sides that allows you to scroll either up or down. This cutting-edge function could come in handy in a variety of situations, such as when you are running.

The sunlight-readable, transflective, memory-in-pixel (MIP) screen has a diameter of 30.4 millimeters and is incredibly vivid. It is also very easy to read both inside and outside. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, and it has a resolution of 240 pixels by 240 pixels. The display will still be viewable even when there is not a lot of light shining on it thanks to the backlight.

Which one is better, the Apple Watch 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

The Apple Watch 3 appears to be fairly similar to the Apple Watch 2 (and the Apple Watch 1). There is not much of a distinction between the two, with the exception of a single dot of red on the crown. The only variation is that the back crystal has been stretched out ever-so-slightly; otherwise, the case is exactly the same size. Its thickness is practically identical to that of the Vivoactive 3, measuring in at 11.65 millimeters. Despite this, it weighs 53 grams, making it the heavier of the two options (depending on the model).

The device is available in two different sizes: 42mm and 38mm.There is a vast selection of styles and colors available to pick from, and the casing can be made of aluminum, stainless steel, or a newly introduced ceramic edition that is four times more durable than stainless steel.

The OLED Retina display with Force Touch found on this device is without a doubt among the very best currently available. The graphics are clear, and they are readable in most lighting settings. The display on the smaller watch has a resolution of 272 by 340 pixels, while the display on the larger watch has a resolution of 312 by 390 pixels.

When it comes to matters of style, the majority of people are likely to think that Apple is superior to Garmin, unless you favor the circular appearance. The display quality of Apple products is noticeably superior, and their user interfaces are noticeably more streamlined and fashionable. One advantage that Garmin has over Apple in terms of the display is the fact that it stays lit up at all times.

Which one is better, the Apple Watch 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

When it comes to sensors, there is not a whole lot of difference between the two. The accelerometer, optical heart rate sensor, and barometric altimeter are all components that are shared across both of them. Both of these gadgets come with improvements to the heart rate monitor, and Apple has introduced a barometric altimeter for the first time, which can measure altitude as well as the number of floors climbed. Garmin’s device comes with a compass for navigation and a thermometer for detecting the temperature outside, whereas the Apple Watch just has a gyroscope for measuring angular velocity. Apple’s watch also contains a gyroscope for measuring angular velocity.

In terms of processing capability, Apple’s third generation tablet comes equipped with a dual-core CPU that is 70 percent faster, and it also features better Bluetooth and WiFi connectivity. Garmin does not make any information regarding its processors available to the public. We are unable to conduct an accurate comparison due to a lack of particular information. However, it is probably safe to conclude that the Apple Watch Series 3 has higher processing power.

Comparing the battery life and water resistance of the Apple Watch 3 to the Garmin Vivoactive 3,

The lifespan of the battery is essential. In a perfect world, you wouldn’t have to charge your smartphone every single night. The bad news is that Apple has not been able to accomplish anything in this regard. Similar to its predecessors, the Series 3 watch has a battery life of approximately 18 hours, but this time it lasts even less when GPS is turned on. It’s possible that this should have been anticipated given the increase in requirements.

According to Garmin, the Vivoactive 3 has a battery life of up to a week on a single charge and can run for 13 hours with the GPS function turned on. Although this is an optimistic estimate, previous experience has shown that you should be able to get approximately four to five days of use out of it. This is still a respectable battery life, and it provides Apple with a benchmark to work toward.

Both trackers are able to withstand any kind of weather because they have a water resistance rating of 5 ATM, which is equivalent to 50 meters. They are also fully capable of tracking the length of time you spend swimming.

Comparing the Apple Watch 3 to the Garmin Vivoactive 3 in Terms of Their Features

While the Vivoactive 3 is lacking in more sophisticated display features, it makes up for it in terms of its activity tracking capabilities. You should be aware that each of these pieces of equipment will meet your needs.This provides information that is reasonably precise on steps, calories, distance, and floors. When you’re having a particularly sedentary day, the trackers will prod you with reminders to get up and move about and will also provide you with motivational messages.

You won’t be able to access the same level of granular information on the light, deep, and REM stages of sleep from the Apple Watch as you will from the Garmin app in the morning. Because the Apple iPhone has a battery life of 18 hours, monitoring one’s sleep on it would be somewhat futile. There are ways around the problem. As long as you charge the watch before going to bed, you do not need to worry about installing a third-party application to complete the task.

Both of these devices are perfectly capable of functioning without the need for a phone when exercising. When you use the built-in GPS to track your outdoor fitness, it will keep track of your pace, distance traveled, elevation gained, and split times. They will also track the number of laps you swim, how long you swim for, and the number of calories you burn while doing so.

Apple has improved its heart rate functions with the release of WatchOS4. You will now be able to see your current heart rate simply by raising your wrist. There is the inclusion of a recovering heart rate, and the watch will warn you when it detects an abnormal rise in your readings. All of these features can be found on the new Apple Watch Series 4. None of these two devices provide the same level of heart rate data as chest straps; however, when compared to other wrist-based competitors, they are neither better nor worse.

You can now get information on floors climbed as well as height with the barometric altimeter sensor that comes standard on the Apple Watch. When it comes to monitoring ski workouts, this fantastic function is one that the corporation will, without a doubt, put to good use.

The device, manufactured by Garmin, takes things further for a more unified and comprehensive experience in the realms of sport and physical activity. This includes an evaluation of your cardiovascular fitness level, also known as your VO2Max, which, in essence, tells you how fit you are. In addition to that, there is a brand new function for counting reps, as well as pre-loaded exercises for the gym.

And let’s not overlook the stress monitoring during the entire day. The Vivoactive 3 will alert you if it detects a rise in your heart rate even while you are not physically active. In the event that you find that your daily life is becoming too stressful for you, the Apple Watch includes a feature that will guide you through breathing exercises to help you remain calm. Additionally, out of the box, Garmin is compatible with accessories such as bicycle sensors and footpods, but Apple is not.

Which one is better, the Apple Watch 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

Moving on to aspects that are not related to fitness Apple is in a league of its own, light years ahead of Garmin. You will receive information about notifications (calls, texts, calendar events, and push notifications from your favorite apps), as well as control over music and access to an app store. But that’s the last we heard of it. We still have some time to wait before Garmin incorporates offline storage for music, a capability that is currently standard on many other types of devices.

Oh, and there’s also something called Garmin Pay. Because the Vivoactive 3 features an embedded NFC chip that can store your credit card information, you won’t need to carry your wallet around with you. FitPay is the company responsible for enabling this capability, and it supports debit and credit cards issued by major issuing banks that are Visa and Mastercard branded.

On the other hand, the Apple Watch performs exceptionally well in this regard. Because of the extensive functionality it offers as a wristwatch, it can act as a seamless extension of your iPhone. There are a plethora of apps, both native and third-party, and the upgrade to watchOS4 includes capabilities such as Siri, streaming of Apple Music, and many other improvements.

Also, let’s not overlook the importance of cellular connectivity. The number used by the watch is the same as the one used by your smartphone. The Series 3 includes a small electronic SIM card, although customers will still require a SIM card to operate the device. When you remove your phone, the watch will use the cellular signal instead of the Bluetooth connection.In addition to native programmes, third-party software will have access to this signal.

Which is better, the Apple Watch 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 3? The bare essentials

The two smartwatches can look similar to one another on paper, but in reality, they are very different from one another. While the Apple Watch is a solution that combines the best of both worlds, the Garmin device delivers a unified and comprehensive fitness tracking experience.

The battery life of Apple’s device is the most significant obstacle in the way of its potential to become a true 24/7 fitness tracker. This is the reason why there is no tracking of, for example, sleep. Despite this, Apple is getting closer and closer to catching up to competitors like Garmin and Fitbit every year. A barometric altimeter that can count floors has been integrated into the third generation of this device, and the heart rate monitoring capabilities have been improved.

In terms of both appearance and functionality, Garmin’s wearables have seen significant development over the course of the past year. The Vivoactive 3 is a device that is streamlined and lightweight, and it will appeal to both men and women in an equal measure. Even though it does not include some of the more advanced performance indicators that are available on Garmin’s more expensive high-end sports watches, it does include the fundamentals when it comes to tracking your fitness.

Which one is better, the Apple Watch 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 3?

However, in terms of capabilities that aren’t related to fitness, the Vivoactive 3 is a far cry from the Apple Watch Series 3, which comes packed with LTE. Bear in mind, though, that the Apple Watch with cellular connectivity is priced a little higher.

Choose the Apple Watch if you want a timepiece that can be worn throughout the day. If you are looking for a fitness tracker first and a smartwatch second, the Vivoactive 3 will undoubtedly leave you more satisfied because it has a longer battery life and provides a more comprehensive experience for tracking your fitness.

Leave a Reply